Architecture and control for role-based property operations
Control is part of the operating model, not a bolt-on feature. Greenhaus explains governance through architecture: role-based access, approval history, payment-provider boundaries, and shared records that are easier to review.
Role-based access
Operators control which records each participant can view or update.
Approval history
Sensitive financial and operational steps can retain durable review history.
Payment boundaries
Stripe-powered payment workflows keep payment handling on established rails while the operating record preserves context.
What we review before rollout
Before moving live workflows, Greenhaus reviews:
Greenhaus treats governance as product architecture: role-based access, approval history, payment-provider boundaries, and workflow review before rollout.
- • Who can view each record type
- • Who can approve financial or operational actions
- • What payment context remains with the payment provider
- • Which records should be imported first
- • Which workflow should stay manual until reviewed
One governed system of record
Operations, accounting, payments, and portals share common records and permissions so workflow decisions stay easier to review.
Operating record
Properties, units, leases, stakeholders, work orders, payments, and ledger context live in one workspace.
Workflow controls
Routing, reminders, approvals, and status changes keep the right ownership and review history.
Role-based views
Operators, owners, residents, vendors, and maintenance teams see different slices of the same record.
Security checklist
Beta architecture review
- • Identify the first workflow to evaluate
- • Confirm stakeholder roles and portal visibility
- • Review payment and accounting handoffs
Workflow governance
- • Define who can approve sensitive steps
- • Confirm import scope before setup
- • Stage evaluation with sample records where needed